Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Petersen v. Flood
as 2:2024cv00206
Petitioner:
Jerry Dean Petersen
Respondent:
John Flood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Petersen v. Snohomish County Superior Court, et al.
as 23-4053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY DEAN PETERSEN
Defendant / Appellee:
SNOHOMISH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Petersen v. Snohomish County Superior Court et al
as 2:2023cv01093
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dean Petersen
Defendant:
Snohomish County Superior Court and State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia et al v. TruVision Health LLC et al
as 5:2023cv03501
Plaintiff:
Deborah Garcia and Tonya Mundy
Defendant:
TruVision Health LLC d/b/a Truvy, a Utah Corporation, David Brown, Derrick Raynes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Petersen v. Kane
as 2:2022cv01356
Petitioner:
Jerry Dean Petersen
Respondent:
Jamie Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
United Specialty Insurance Company v. Petersen
as 2:2016cv02480
Plaintiff:
United Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Dean Petersen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United Specialty Insurance Company v. Petersen
as 2:2016at01295
Plaintiff:
United Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Dean Petersen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United Specialty Insurance Company v. Petersen et al
as 2:2016at01294
Plaintiff:
United Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Dean Petersen and Petersen Construction Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
United Specialty Insurance Company v. Petersen
as 2:2015cv01096
Plaintiff:
United Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Dean Petersen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
United Specialty Insurance Company v. Petersen
as 1:2015at00416
Plaintiff:
United Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Dean Petersen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
