Cases 1 - 5 of 5
E. v. United Healthcare Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Rob E.
Defendant:
United Healthcare Insurance Company, United Behavioral Health, the Administrative Committee of Delta Airlines Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Diagnositc Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC v. United Health Group,Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00131
Counter Claimant:
Siemens Corporation Group Insurance and Flexible Benefits Program, Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc. Welfare Benefits Plan, Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. Welfare Plan and others
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No.1, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom Partners' Welfare Benefits Plan, Apple Inc. Health and Welfare Benefit Plan and others
Plaintiff:
Diagnositc Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC dba 24 Hour Covid RT-PCR Laboratory and Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC doing business as 24 Hour COVIDRT-PCR Laboratory
Cross Defendant:
OptumHealth Care Solutions, Inc. and UHG, Inc, Group Benefits Plan
Cross Claimant:
Envision Healthcare Corporation Welfare Benefits Plan
Counter Defendant:
Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Anness v. Delta Account-Based Healthcare Plan et al
as 1:2017cv00640
Plaintiff:
Harold L Anness
Defendant:
Delta Account-Based Healthcare Plan and United HealthCare Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Forest Ambulatory Surgical Associates, L.P. v. United Healthcare Insurance Company
as 2:2012cv02916
Respondent:
AG Neovo Technology Corp, Health Benefits Plan, AG Neovo Technology Corp., AT&T Medical Plan and others
Petitioner:
Forest Ambulatory Surgical Associates, L.P.
Unknown:
Gwendolyn L. Fanger and Paul Tweedie Smith
C. et al v. Delta Account Based Healthcare Plan et al
as 2:2011cv00269
Plaintiff:
Deborah C. and Matthew C.
Defendant:
Delta Account Based Healthcare Plan and United Behavioral Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
