Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Dennis Underwood v. Brad Cain
as 23-35063
Petitioner / Appellant:
DENNIS BURTON UNDERWOOD
Respondent / Appellee:
BRAD CAIN, Superintendent Snake River Correctional Institute
Underwood v. Marzilli et al
as 3:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Dennis Burton Underwood
Defendant:
David Marzilli, C/O Brown, C/O Jane/Jon Doe 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis Underwood v. Cox, et al
as 22-35782
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS BURTON UNDERWOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
COX, JANELL ROCHESTER, ROJAS and others
Dennis Underwood v. Cox, et al
as 21-35135
Defendant / Appellee:
BRAD CAIN, COURT CLERK, YIM YOU, Judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS BURTON UNDERWOOD
Dennis Underwood v. Cox, et al
as 21-35031
Defendant / Appellee:
BRAD CAIN, COURT CLERK, YIM YOU, Judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS BURTON UNDERWOOD
Underwood v. Cox et al
as 2:2020cv01670
Plaintiff:
Dennis Burton Underwood
Defendant:
Brad Cain, John Doe, Court Clerk Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis Underwood v. Brad Cain
as 20-35491
Respondent / Appellee:
BRAD CAIN, Superintendent Snake River Correctional Institute
Petitioner / Appellant:
DENNIS BURTON UNDERWOOD
Underwood v. Cain
as 2:2020cv00041
Petitioner:
Dennis Burton Underwood
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dennis Underwood v. Taylor Appelo, et al
as 19-35448
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH, NICHOLAS CREW, TRANSCRIPT COORDINATOR and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LELAND KLAUZER, CITY OF PORTLAND, JOSEPH WEBBER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS BURTON UNDERWOOD
Dennis Underwood v. USDC-ORPEN
as 18-71697
:
In re: DENNIS BURTON UNDERWOOD
Petitioner:
DENNIS BURTON UNDERWOOD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, PENDLETON
Real Party In Interest:
WILLIAM WALSH, JEFF AUXIER, JERRY BRIAN HODSON, in capacity as Judge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
