Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jemison v. McMullen et al
as 2:2023cv01170
Plaintiff:
Dennis E. Jemison
Defendant:
Rodney McMullen and Clay Richards
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Jemison v. McMullen et al
as 1:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
Dennis E. Jemison
Defendant:
Rodney McMullen and Clay Richards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Murray et al v. Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 3:2020cv00474
Defendant:
Tigerquote.com Insurance Solutions of Pennsylvania, Inc. and Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Margaret A. Murray and Dennis E. Murray, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roman v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv00739
Plaintiff:
Dennis E. Roman
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Curry et al.
as 2:2013cv00527
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Richard L. Curry, Cathleen L. Curry, Dennis E. Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Brake et al v. City of Sandusky, Ohio et al
as 3:2008cv02107
Plaintiff:
Jason Brake, Daniel Waddington, Brett Fuqua and others
Defendant:
City of Sandusky, Ohio, Dennis E. Murray, Jr. and Craig Stahl
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Murray et al v. United States of America
as 1:2008cv00969
Plaintiff:
Margaret A. Murray and Dennis E. Murray, Sr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
