Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Friedt v. Salmonsen et al
as 1:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Dennis Friedt
Respondent:
James Salmonsen and Austin Knudsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In Re Friedt
as 1:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Dennis Friedt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Friedt v. Salmonsen et al
as 1:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Dennis Friedt
Defendant:
James Salmonsen, Greg Gianforte, Montana State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Friedt v. Salmonsen et al
as 1:2023cv00051
Petitioner:
Dennis Friedt
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Austin Knudsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Friedt v. Salmonsen et al
as 1:2023cv00021
Petitioner:
Dennis Friedt
Respondent:
James Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dennis Friedt v. USDC-MHEIn re: Dennis Friedt v. USDC-MHE
as 23-70018
Not Classified By Court:
In re: DENNIS FRIEDT, MONTANA SUPREME COURT, MIKE MCGRATH and others
Petitioner:
DENNIS FRIEDT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA, HELENA
Friedt v. Montana Supreme Court
as 2:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Dennis Friedt
Defendant:
Montana Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Friedt v. Montana Supreme Court et al
as 6:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Dennis Friedt
Defendant:
Montana Supreme Court, Mike McGrath, Jim Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Friedt v. Server et al
as 1:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Dennis Friedt
Defendant:
Collyn Server, Donna Mendenhall and Jim Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis Friedt v. Austin Knudsen, et al
as 22-35156
Petitioner / Appellant:
DENNIS FRIEDT
Respondent / Appellee:
AUSTIN KNUDSEN and PETE BLUDWORTH, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
