Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Allison Rice v. City and County of San Francisco, et al
as 23-16013
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLISON BARTON RICE, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Defendant:
LONDON BREED, Mayor of the City of San Francisco, KATE HARTLEY, Director of the San Francisco Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development, MARIA BENJAMIN, Director of Homeownership & Below Market Rate Programs San Francisco Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development and others
Richards v. Tumlin et al
as 4:2021cv04420
Defendant:
Customer Service Representative Director, Client Services Representative Sales, Manny Yekutiel and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Endo International plc v. USDC-CASF
as 20-73725
Not Classified By Court:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, In re: ENDO INTERNATIONAL PLC and THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through San Francisco City Attorney Dennis J. Herrera
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Petitioner:
ENDO INTERNATIONAL PLC
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries v. USDC-CASF
as 20-73430
Not Classified By Court:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through San Francisco City Attorney Dennis J. Herrera and In re: TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD.
Petitioner:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Allison Rice v. City & County of San Francisco, et al
as 20-15087
Defendant / Appellee:
DENNIS J. HERRERA, San Francisco City Attorney, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, MARIA BENJAMIN, Director of Homeownership & Below Market Rate Programs San Francisco Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLISON BARTON RICE, an individual
City and County of San Francisco et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 4:2018cv07591
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Richard S. Sackler, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
City and County of San Francisco and The People of the State of California acting by and through San Francisco City Attorney Dennis J. Herrera
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
City of Oakland, et al v. BP P.L.C., et al
as 18-16663
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CITY OF OAKLAND, a Municipal Corporation, and The People of the State of California, acting by and through the Oakland City Attorney and CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a Municipal Corporation, and The People of the State of California, acting by and through the San Francisco City Attorney Dennis J. Herrera
Defendant - Appellee:
BP P.L.C., a public limited company of England and Wales, CHEVRON CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, a Delaware corporation and others
Missud v. City and County of San Francisco, et al
as 3:2015cv05596
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Missud
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco , San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, Auto-Return and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
First Resort, Inc. v. Dennis Herrera, et al
as 15-15434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FIRST RESORT, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
DENNIS J. HERRERA, in his official capacity as City Attorney of the City of San Francisco, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Amicus Curiae:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA RELIGIOUS COALITION FOR REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE, CALIFORNIA WOMEN LAWYERS and others
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o et al v. Toshiba Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05230
Plaintiff:
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o , The State of Arizona by its Attorney GeneralTom Horne , The State of Arkansas by its Attorney General Dustin McDaniel and others
Defendant:
Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
