Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Fletcher, et al v. Williams, et al
as 22-1371
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN PATRICK FLETCHER
Plaintiff:
ZACHARIAH CLARK DOBLER
Defendant / Appellee:
DEAN WILLIAMS, SIMON DENWALT, SANDRA BROWNLEE and others
Williams v. Denwalt et al
as 1:2021cv02595
Plaintiff:
Charles Lamont Williams
Defendant:
Simon Denwalt, Simon (I) Denwalt, Austin Chrestensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Myers, et al
as 20-1251
Defendant / Appellee:
MYERS, BRITTANY GOODWIN, C.M. DENWALT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN L. HILL
Brooks v. Schwartz, et al
as 19-1368
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN NITSCH, individually and in his official capacity as CDOC Captain, COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JENNIFER HANSEN, individually and in her official capacity as CDOC Major and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH CLAYTON BROOKS, JR.
Brooks v. Schwartz et al
as 1:2019cv02088
Defendant:
Alan (I) Hysjulien, Alan Hysjulien, Anthony (I) DeCesaro and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Clayton Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mehdipour v. Denwalt-Hammond et al
as 5:2018cv00268
Plaintiff:
Faramarz Mehdipour
Defendant:
Lisa Denwalt-Hammond, C Wesley Lane, II and David Prater
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maes v. Bland et al
as 1:2018cv00052
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ray Maes
Defendant:
Bland, Alluisi, Denwalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huddleston v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2015cv02537
Plaintiff:
Dale Justin Huddleston
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Andrew Martinez, Andrew (I) Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Julien v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2015cv01835
Plaintiff:
Dywand Daytron Julien
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Brandon Shaffer, Mary Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Jr. v. Lengerich et al
as 1:2014cv00983
Plaintiff:
Henry L. James Jr.
Defendant:
Lengerich, Denwalt and Argeys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
