Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Eeon v. United States of America Department of Agriculture et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2018cv03449
Plaintiff:
Eeon, Concetta McBride and Gregory S. McBride
Defendant:
United States of America Department of Agriculture, United Sates of America Social Security Administration, United States of America Federal Emergency Managment Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Idaho County, et al v. USFS, et al
as 17-35714
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IDAHO COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Idaho, IDAHO COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, a political subdivision of the State of Idaho, OPEN ROADS 4 IDAHO LTD., an Idaho nonprofit corporation and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a federal agency within the Department of Agriculture and RICK BRAZELL, Forest Supervisor, Nez Perce National Forest
Montana Mine Land Holdings et al v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 6:2017cv00065
Plaintiff:
Montana Mine Land Holdings , Tracy Fortner and Marcy Fortner
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Sonny Perdue, United States Forest Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
Wonder Ranch, LLC v. USA, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 16-36071
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant:
WONDER RANCH, LLC
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, acting through the U.S. Forest Service, and Melany Glossa, in her capacity as Supervisor of the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest
Wellcome v. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service et al
as 2:2015cv00031
Plaintiff:
George Page Wellcome
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Charlene F. Bucha, Jennifer Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
West et al v. U.S. Forest Service et al
as 4:2015cv00249
Plaintiff:
Stephen West and Martha West
Defendant:
U.S. Forest Service and U.S. Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
County of Kaua'i v. United States Department of Agriculture Rural Housing Service et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2015cv00204
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture Rural Housing Service , Debra Marie Girald and Does 1-20
Plaintiff:
County of Kaua'i
Cross_claimant:
United States Department of Agriculture Rural Housing Service
Cross_defendant:
Debra Marie Girald
Counter_claimant:
United States Department of Agriculture Rural Housing Service
Counter_defendant:
County of Kaua'i
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
United States Department of Agriculture Rural Development v. The Estate of Linda Earl et al
as 3:2014cv02004
Defendant:
City of Madras, Diane Clennen, GE Money Bank, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
United States Department of Agriculture Rural Development
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Wonder Ranch v USA et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2014cv00057
Plaintiff:
Wonder Ranch
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
Schema v. United States Department of Agriculture, et al.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2014cv00630
Plaintiff:
John D. Schema
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack, United States Forest Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.