Cases 31 - 40 of 253
Michael Martin v. Harold Clarke
as 21-7100
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL L. MARTIN
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Adam Pelletier v. Harold Clarke
as 21-7097
Petitioner / Appellant:
ADAM PELLETIER
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Michael Martin v. Harold Clarke
as 21-7095
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL L. MARTIN
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Robert Koon v. Timothy Clark
as 21-7072
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT HOLLAND KOON, a/k/a Robert Koon, a/k/a Robert H. Koon
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY CLARK, JORDAN WILLIAMS, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Defendant:
NURSE SARAH LENTZ, DOCTOR SEAN JONES, TRIDENT MEDICAL CENTER, LLC and others
Latron Brown v. Harold Clarke
as 21-7036
Petitioner / Appellant:
LATRON DUPREE BROWN
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Department of Corrections
Jonathan LaClair v. VDOC
as 21-7012
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN WALKER LACLAIR
Defendant / Appellee:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Marcus Dixon v. Director of Department of Corrections
as 21-7016
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARCUS LE'SHAWN DIXON
Respondent / Appellee:
DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Eugene Thomas v. Warden of McCormick Correctional Institution
as 21-7005
Petitioner / Appellant:
EUGENE THOMAS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, MCCORMICK CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
William Thorpe v. Harold Clarke
as 21-1714
Defendant / Appellant:
H. S. RICHESON, TORI RAIFORD, HAROLD CLARKE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STEVEN RIDDICK, GARY WALL, KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR. and others
Defendant:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Nace Houchin, Jr. v. Mark Herring
as 21-6980
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NACE HOUCHIN, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Policy and MARK HERRING, A.G. Dept. of Justice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
