Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-3265
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-4130
Petitioner - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-3214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Berryhill v. United States, et al
as 14-6140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Allen v. U.S. Attorney General's Office, et al
as 14-1183
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GENE ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, et al., OFFICE OF DETENTION AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1028
Petitioner - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
G.H. Daniels III & Assoc., et al v. Perez, et al
as 13-1479
Plaintiff - Appellant:
G.H. DANIELS & ASSOCIATES, INC. and HANDY ANDY SNOW REMOVAL
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor, RAND BEERS, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, JOHN KERRY, Secretary of State and others
Glaser v. City and County of Denver, et al
as 13-1165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS A. GLASER
Defendant - Appellee:
THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO, MITCH MORRISSEY, in his official and individual capacities, JOE MORALES, Denver Deputy District Attorney, in his official and individual capacities and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2193
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2175
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
