Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Maisano v. Warren et al
as 3:2018cv01094
Defendant:
Alice Warren, Corizon Healthcare and Az. Dept. of Corr.
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Warren et al
as 3:2018cv01062
Defendant:
Alice Warren, Corizon Healthcare and Arizona Dept. of Corrs.
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanton et al v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2018cv00825
Defendant:
Core Civic and Tenn. Dept. of Corr.
Plaintiff:
Juan LaSean Perry and Jacob Stanton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyle v. TN. Dept. of Corr. (T.D.O.C.) et al
as 3:2016cv01441
Plaintiff:
Robert Douglas Lyle
Defendant:
TN. Dept. of Corr. (T.D.O.C.), John Fuson, Derrick Schofield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parson v. Shelby Co. Dept. of Corr.
as 2:2014cv02481
Plaintiff:
Donny Parson
Defendant:
Shelby Co. Dept. of Corr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caery v. Shelby County et al
as 2:2012cv02389
Plaintiff:
Frederick L. Caery
Defendant:
Shelby Co. Dept. of Corr., Minus Adams, Karen Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parson v. Shelby County Dept. of Corr. et al
as 2:2012cv02292
Plaintiff:
Donny Parson
Defendant:
Shelby County Dept. of Corr., Ollie Watts, Loggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parson v. Shelby Co. Dept. of Corr. et al
as 2:2011cv03117
Plaintiff:
Donny Parson
Defendant:
Shelby Co. Dept. of Corr., Royston, Holiday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barlow v. Shelby County Dept. of Corr. et al
as 2:2011cv03040
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Barlow, Jr.
Defendant:
Shelby County Dept. of Corr., Correct Care Solutions, Correctional Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parson v. Shelby County Dept. of Corr. et al
as 2:2011cv02871
Plaintiff:
Donny Parson
Defendant:
Shelby County Dept. of Corr., Correct Care Solutions, Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
