Cases 1 - 10 of 20
HARRIS SR. v. US DEPT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2023cv00705
Petitioner:
STEVEN JERMAINE HARRIS SR.
Respondent:
US DEPT OF JUSTICE and US DEPT OF INTERIOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WINTERHALTER v. US DEPT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2023cv00547
Petitioner:
FRANKIE DEAN WINTERHALTER
Respondent:
US DEPT OF JUSTICE and US DEPT OF INTERIOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00348
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02467
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02451
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02452
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
FRANKLIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv02203
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA D. FRANKLIN and JOSH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC., FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. STATE OF MARYLAND et al
as 1:2022cv01830
Plaintiff:
ANDREW SCOTT TAYLOR
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND, LEONARD VANDERLINDE, JULIE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HEAD v. SAMPLE et al
as 1:2021cv02550
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HEAD
Defendant:
SAMPLE, J. R. BELL, S. EIRICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGOPOULOS v. U.S. DEPT. OF THE TREASURY
as 1:2021cv02413
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ROGOPOULOS
Defendant:
U.S. DEPT. OF THE TREASURY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
