Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Parmlee v. State of CT Office of the Attorney General
as 22-1805
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD T. PARMLEE
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CONNECTICUT OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL and STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPT. OF REVENUE SERVICES
SLUPKOWSKI V JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL
as 08-1561
Respondent-Appellee:
General Counsel Dept of Health & Human Services, General Counsel Dept of Veterans Affairs and Judge Advocate General Dept of the U.S. Navy
Petitioner-Appellant:
Stanely A. Slupkowski
TABOR V DEFENSE
as 06-3299
Respondent:
Dept. of Defense, Domestic Dependents Elem.& Sec. Schools
Petitioner:
Judd Tabor
REGENTS UNIV OF CALIF V UNIV OF IA
as 05-1374
Appellee:
COLEY PHARMACEUTICAL GROUP, INC., UNIVERSITY OF IOWA RESEARCH FOUNDATION and US, as represented by the Dept of Health & Human Services
Appellant:
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
PHARM RESEARCH V MAINE DEPT HUM SVC
as 03-1499
Movant-Appellant:
EDWIN D. SCHINDLER
Defendant-Appellee:
G. STEVEN ROWE, Attorney General for the State of Maine, and PETER E. WALSH, Acting Commissioner, Maine Dept of Human Ser
PETER E. WALSH, Acting Commissioner, Maine Dept Of Human Ser:
Plaintiff-Appellee:
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA
HUSKEY V TRUJILLO
as 02-1022
Plaintiff-Appellant:
JOSEPHINE HUSKEY, JOSEPHINE HUSKEY, JOSEPHINE HUSKEY and others
Defendant-Appellee:
MICHAEL H. TRUJILLO, Director of the Indian Health Svc, Dept OF HHS, MICHAEL H. TRUJILLO, Director of the Indian Health Svc, Dept OF HHS, MICHAEL H. TRUJILLO, Director of the Indian Health Svc, Dept OF HHS and others
HELMARK STEEL V DOT
as 00-1120
Defendant-Appellee:
CLEMENT H. MONGE, Regional Director USDOT Dept Office of CivIL RIGHTS and DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Plaintiff-Appellant:
HELMARK STEEL, INC.
KIRK/MARSLAND ADVERTISING V HHS
as 00-1029
Appellee:
DONNA E. SHALALA, SECRETARY OF THE DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN
Appellant:
KIRK/MARSLAND ADVERTISING, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
