Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Patelunas v. Estate of Anthony Lupas Jr. et al
as 3:2023cv02130
Plaintiff:
Jerome J. Patelunas and Jerome J. Patelunas, II
Defendant:
Estate of Anthony Lupas Jr., Unknown Co-Conspirators-Luzerne County, F.B.I. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY GROWTH, INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPT. OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT et al
as 2:2023cv04587
Plaintiff:
PHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY GROWTH, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPT. OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, JACQUELINE STAGGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Petition to Quiet Ti
SMALIS et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2019cv01066
Defendant:
DEPT OF BUILDING INSPECTIONS, DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS, CITY OF PITTSBURGH and others
Plaintiff:
LIPSOSS CORP CONSTRUCTORS and ANASTASIOS ERNEST SMALIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC v. A PERMANENT EASEMENT OF 0.49 ACRE + AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 0.63 ACRE + IN TOWAMENSING TOWNSHIP, CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 16D-56-A27 et al
as 3:2018cv00277
Plaintiff:
PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant:
A PERMANENT EASEMENT OF 0.49 ACRE/- AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 0.63 ACRE /- IN TOWAMENSING TOWNSHIP, CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 16D-56-A27 , BEDRETTIN ANGUN , U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY - INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
BARNETT et al v. PHILADELPHIA CITY LAW DEPT. OF L&I CLEAR AND SEAL ENFORCEMENT DIVISION
as 2:2011cv04023
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN T. BARNETT and GWENDOLYN BARNETT
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA CITY LAW DEPT. OF L&I CLEAR AND SEAL ENFORCEMENT DIVISION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Klein v. U.S. Bank N.A. et al
as 3:2009cv01705
Plaintiff:
Dennis Klein
Defendant:
U.S. Bank N.A., Udren Law Firm Offices, Pike County Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
