Cases 1 - 9 of 9
DITTEMORE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv01069
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DESIREE DITTEMORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AGEDAH v. WASHINGTON METRO AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2021cv01050
Plaintiff:
THEOPHILUS TARI AGEDAH
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METRO AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, NIKKI MACKALL and DESIREE ROCHELLE TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
WOODARD v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2016cv01857
Plaintiff:
DESIREE WOODARD
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
WOODARD v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2016cv00588
Plaintiff:
DESIREE WOODARD
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
POLLARD et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2012cv01010
Plaintiff:
ANITRA POLLARD and LAKEISHA WITHERSPOON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , CATHY L. LANIER , HAMPTON DURHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DORSEY v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2010cv00741
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B. DORSEY
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, LUCINDA BABERS, WANDA BUTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: Subpoena to Condolezza Rice
as 1:2008mc00039
Petitioner:
CONDOLEEZA RICE
Respondent:
DESIREE ALI-FAIROOZ
BURNETT et al v. AL BARAKA INVESTMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et al
as 1:2002cv01616
Defendant:
GOLBAL RELIEF FOUNDATION, AL RAJHI BANKING AND INVESTMENT, BENEVOLENCE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES ALARIO, RINA RABINOWITZ, THOMAS J. MEEHAN, III and others
Petitioner:
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY, JOHN DOE CORPORATION and others
Intervenor:
LYNN FAULKNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
