Cases 1 - 10 of 762
Baugh v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2024cv11177
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Baugh
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Wayne County Prosecutors Office and Joann Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Key v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2024cv10458
Plaintiff:
Kelly Royce Key
Defendant:
Detroit, City of and Wayne County Treasurer
Key v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2024cv11054
Plaintiff:
Kelly Royce Key
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Michigan, State of and American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees
Pierce v. Detroit Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv10604
Plaintiff:
Lori Pierce
Defendant:
Detroit Police Department, Charles Fitzgerald, Scott Barrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Denlinger v. Rios et al
as 2:2024cv10452
Plaintiff:
Adam Denlinger
Defendant:
David Rios, Mark Sievers, Brenda Hernandez and others
Banks v. Detroit, City of et al
as 5:2024cv10516
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Banks
Defendant:
City of Detroit, a municipal corporation, Officer Juwan Brown, Sargeant Jarmiare McEntire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Detroit, City of v. United States Department of Commerce et al
as 2:2024cv10775
Plaintiff:
Detroit, City of
Defendant:
United States Department of Commerce, Gina M Raimondo, United States Census Bureau and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Taylor v. Moore et al
as 4:2024cv10739
Plaintiff:
Camille Taylor
Defendant:
Shanita Moore, Michael Cardenas and Detroit, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Berry v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2024cv10282
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Berry
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Aaron Lewber, Bryan Borowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glenn v. Kraszewski et al
as 2:2024cv10665
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Glenn, III
Defendant:
Aaron Kraszewski and Detroit, City of
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
