Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Antiona Phillips v. Dexter Payne
as 24-1621
Plaintiff:
Antiona Lee Phillips
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
Brent McJunkins v. Dexter Payne
as 24-1506
Plaintiff:
Brent Charles McJunkins
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Corrections
Timothy Joyner v. Dexter Payne
as 24-1458
Plaintiff:
Timothy Justin Joyner
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
Christopher Butler v. Dexter Payne
as 24-1063
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Butler
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
Alvin Aikens v. Dexter Payne
as 23-3621
Petitioner:
Alvin Dejuan Aikens
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
Duane Gonder v. Dexter Payne
as 23-3197
Petitioner:
Duane J. Gonder
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
DeAndra Stephenson v. Dexter Payne
as 23-3184
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DeAndra Stephenson
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
Bobby Robertson v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 23-3169
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bobby Lee Robertson
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction, James Gibson, Warden, Varner Supermax, ADC, James Shipman, Warden, Tucker Max Security Unit, ADC, (Former Deputy Warden, Varner Supermax Unit, ADC) and others
Defendant:
Dale Reed, Director, DOC, William Straughn, Assistant Director, ADC (DOC), Maurice Culclager, Deputy Warden, Tucker Maximum Security Unit, ADC and others
Darrell Dennis v. Dexter Payne
as 23-3083
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darrell Dennis
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction (originally named as Dexter Paine)
Samuel Douglas v. Dexter Payne
as 23-3056
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Samuel Douglas
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
