Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Cygan et al v. Diamond Pet Food Processors of South Carolina, LLC
as 1:2014cv04725
Plaintiff:
Joanna Cygan and Cezary Cygan
Defendant:
Diamond Pet Food Processors of South Carolina, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EISENBERG v. DIAMOND PET FOOD PROCESSORS OF SC, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv03127
Plaintiff:
NEVIN EISENBERG
Defendant:
DIAMOND PET FOOD PROCESSORS OF SC, LLC and COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pet Owner Class Plaintiffs v. Menu Food
as 09-1580
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PET OWNER CLASS PLAINTIFFS, DUSTIN TURNER, Non-Named Members of the Plaintiff Class and JIM W JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MENU FOODS DEFENDANTS, WAL MART STORES INC, EUKANUBA and others
Not Party - Appellant:
DONALD R. EARL
Daniel Kaffer v. Menu Food
as 08-4779
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL KAFFER, Non Named Settlement Class Members and MARGARET PICUS
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PET OWNER CLASS PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee:
MENU FOODS DEFENDANTS, WAL MART STORES INC, EUKANUBA and others
Pet Owner Class Plaintiffs v. Menu Food
as 08-4741
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PET OWNER CLASS PLAINTIFFS
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIM W JOHNSON and DUSTIN TURNER, Non-Named Members of the Plaintiff Class
Defendant - Appellee:
MENU FOODS DEFENDANTS, WAL MART STORES INC, EUKANUBA and others
Jones v. Schell & Kampeter, Inc., et al
as 3:2007cv00052
Plaintiff:
Vicky Jones, Vicky Jones and Vicky Jones
Defendant:
Schell & Kampeter, Inc. and Diamond Pet Food Processors of South Carolina LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Tompkins v. Menu Foods Midwest Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv00736
Plaintiff:
Emily Tompkins, Emily Tompkins, Harmony Adams and others
Defendant:
Menu Foods Midwest Corporation, Menu Foods Income Fund, Menu Foods Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
