Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
HENRY v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2024cv01276
Plaintiff: MICHAEL F. HENRY
Defendant: JOHN ROBERTS, MARY JANE THEIS, DIANE SYKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mohammed v. Pallmeyer et al
as 1:2024cv02382
Plaintiff: Abdul Mohammed
Defendant: Chief Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer, Judge Ana Reyes, Judge Christopher Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02251
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Abdul Mohammed v. Frank Easterbrook, et al
as 23-5293
Plaintiff / Appellant: Abdul Azeem Mohammed
Defendant / Appellee: Frank Easterbrook, Hon., Vanita Gupta, Merrick B. Garland and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03253
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
MOHAMMED v. EASTERBROOK et al
as 1:2023cv02003
Plaintiff: ABDUL MOHAMMED
Defendant: FRANK EASTERBROOK, VANITA GUPTA, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5136
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Luedtke, James v. Keyes, R.D. et al
as 3:2023cv00496
Plaintiff: James Luedtke
Defendant: Warden R.D. Keyes, James Peterson, Stephen Crocker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00788
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
Mohammed v. Pallmeyer et al
as 1:2022cv05937
Plaintiff: Abdul Mohammed
Defendant: Chief Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer, Chief Judge Diane Sykes, Clerk Thomas Bruton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?