Cases 1 - 10 of 257
Enrique Diaz v. ODOC, et al
as 23-35441
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ENRIQUE ZACARIAS DIAZ
Defendant / Appellee:
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, M. TESTER and A. BLANCO
Preston Martin-Richardson v. King County Correctional Facility, et al
as 23-35402
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PRESTON EUGENE MARTIN-RICHARDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
KING COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN/JANE DOE, Warden, King County Correctional Facility, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-20, Director of Operations/Management and others
John Nieto v. Gordon, et al
as 23-15788
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN MOISES NIETO
Defendant / Appellee:
GORDON, Warden, YORK, DIAZ-NAVARRO and others
Shawn Goff v. Rode, et al
as 23-15572
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN CHARLES GOFF
Defendant / Appellee:
RODE, Ex Deputy Warden;Unknown, R. KAUFMAN, Ex Assistant Deputy Warden, STRODE, Correctional Officer III/Hearing Officer;Unknown and others
Mona Murillo v. J. Castillo, et al
as 23-15491
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MONA SALCIDA MURILLO
Defendant / Appellee:
J. CASTILLO, D. LEPE, GARCIA and others
Robert Cole, Jr. v. K. Allison, et al
as 23-15149
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LEE COLE, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
K. ALLISON, Director of the Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of the Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, RON DAVIS, Associate Director of Reception Centers (ADRC) of CDCR and others
Donivan Diaz v. Raymond Madden
as 23-55061
Petitioner / Appellant:
DONIVAN DIAZ
Respondent / Appellee:
RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden
Enrique Diaz v. A. Grant
as 23-35023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ENRIQUE ZACARIAS DIAZ
Defendant / Appellee:
A. GRANT
Darryl Hudson v. C. Pfeiffer, et al
as 22-17002
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRYL W. HUDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
C. PFEIFFER, Warden, R. COX, J. DIAZ and others
Enrique Diaz v. K. Harris
as 22-36044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ENRIQUE ZACARIAS DIAZ
Defendant / Appellee:
K. HARRIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
