Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Johnson v. Snohomish County et al
as 2:2023cv01378
Plaintiff:
Travon Deautry Lee Johnson and Travon Johnson
Defendant:
Officer Leyden, Officer Officer Navarro, Snohomish county sherrif and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benshoof v. Keenan et al
as 2:2023cv00751
Plaintiff:
Kurt Benshoof and Kurt Benshoof, I
Defendant:
David Keenan, Adrian Diaz and Jessica Owen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jackson v King County Adult Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv00569
Plaintiff:
Dwante Jackson and Dawnte Jackson
Defendant:
King County Adult Corrections, D Echols, Richmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cater v King County et al
as 2:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Halfred Cater
Defendant:
King County, King County Adult Corrections Department, Faauma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinlan v. Diaz
as 2:2022cv00605
Petitioner:
Terrance Joe Quinlan
Respondent:
John Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Broadus v. Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention et al
as 2:2021cv01720
Plaintiff:
Marvin Tate Broadus
Defendant:
Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention, John Diaz and Head of Kitchen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv01285
Petitioner:
Brian Diaz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Willingham v. Diaz
as 2:2021cv01279
Petitioner:
Remington Donovan Willingham and Remington Dono LeBoe
Respondent:
John Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Krier v Diaz
as 2:2021cv00102
Petitioner:
Steven J Krier
Respondent:
John Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Valdovinos-Diaz v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv05940
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Carlos Valdovinos-Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
