Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Diaz v. Crow
as 4:2022cv00457
Petitioner:
Jose Manuel Diaz
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00395
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gray v. Diaz-Ramirez et al
as 4:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Brett W Gray
Defendant:
Rafael Diaz-Ramirez and Blits Med LLC d/b/a Blits Med Trucking and Logistics, a California Corporation - Blits Med Trucking and Logistics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00690
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz et al v. Cypress Energy Management TIR, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00668
Defendant:
Tulsa Inspection Resources, LLC and Cypress Energy Management TIR, LLC
Plaintiff:
Paul Martin, Vicente Gonzalez and Francisco Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Diaz v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
as 4:2017cv00417
Plaintiff:
Felixander Diaz
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Gray v. Diaz
as 4:2016cv00756
Plaintiff:
LaToya Gray
Defendant:
Jose Rivera Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mann v. Steel and Pipe Supply Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00673
Plaintiff:
Michelle Mann, Michelle Mann and Michelle Mann
Defendant:
Steel and Pipe Supply Company, Inc. and Michael Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States of America v. Kirkland et al
as 4:2009cv00460
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Muril Kirkland, Dallas Kirkland, Mary Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
