Cases 1 - 10 of 20
iBot Control Systems, Inc. v. Ralph Dieter Baeumle
as 4:2021cv00541
Defendant:
Ralph Dieter Baeumle
Plaintiff:
iBot Control Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Tatum v. Moennich et al
as 2:2018cv00248
Plaintiff:
Clifford E Tatum
Defendant:
Heinz-Werner Dieter Moennich and DHESI Enterprises LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Dieter et al
as 3:2016cv00082
Defendant:
Philipp Dieter, III and LM Fitness, LLC
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Finch v. Texas Department Of Public Safety
as 4:2015cv02585
Plaintiff:
Dieter M Finch
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Finch v. Texas Department of Public Safety.
as 4:2015mc02124
Plaintiff:
Dieter M Finch
Defendant:
Texas Department of Public Safety
Loeblich et al v. Security, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00286
Plaintiff:
Kurt Dieter Loeblich and Cloudy Collaborations LLC
Defendant:
McKarrish Security LLC and Brandon Parrish
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Vapors, LLC v. Loeblich et al
as 3:2015cv00202
Plaintiff:
Metro Vapors, LLC
Defendant:
Kurt Dieter Loeblich , Cloudy Collaborations, LLC and Neal M. Knebel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv03716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Finch v. Texas Health and Human Services Commission et al
as 4:2013mc02860
Plaintiff:
Dieter M Finch
Defendant:
Texas Health and Human Services Commision, Texas Departmetn of Health and Human Services System, Texas Department of Family and Protective Services and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv03663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
