Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Regonini v. Medical Device Business Services Inc et al
as 3:2021cv02664
Special Master:
Special Master
Plaintiff:
Robert Regonini
Defendant:
Medical Device Business Services Inc, Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
D.P. et al v. Holy See (Vatican City State) et al
as 4:2021cv02286
Plaintiff:
D. P., JANE DOE and A. P.
Defendant:
holy see (vatican city state), The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Galveston - Houston, Cardinal Daniel N. Dinardo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe et al v. See et al
as 4:2020cv00534
Defendant:
Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston, Holy See, Daniel N Cardinal DiNardo and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DiNardo et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, et al
as 3:2013cv03571
Plaintiff:
Joan DiNardo and Joseph DiNardo
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ayika v. Ochoa et al
as 3:2009cv00235
Petitioner:
Paul Benjamin Chuka Ayika
Respondent:
Armando Ochoa, James Tamayo, Kevin J. Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ayika v. Ochoa et al
as 7:2009cv00051
Petitioner:
Paul Benjamin Chuka Ayika
Respondent:
Armando Ochoa, James Tamayo, Kevin J. Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The DiNardo Law Firm and Masry & Vititoe, PC v. Servicios Legales De Mesoamerica, S. de. R.L.
as 7:2008cv00225
Defendant:
Servicios Legales De Mesoamerica, S. de. R.L.
Plaintiff:
The DiNardo Law Firm and Masry & Vititoe, PC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Newsom et al
as 3:2007cv01235
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Tommy Newsom, Verna Parker, Angela Dinardo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
