Cases 1 - 10 of 10,745
Grimes v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
John A Grimes
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, Board of Pardons and Paroles, S Holomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2023cv00284
Petitioner:
Marcus Quin Butler
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Palmer vs Director, TDCJ
as 6:2023cv00583
Petitioner:
Mark Wayne Palmer, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00584
Petitioner:
Ernest L. Brown
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz-Banegas v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv01033
Petitioner:
Kenneth Said Cruz-Banegas
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2023cv00187
Petitioner:
Andre Jackson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mayer v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00785
Petitioner:
Karl Andrew Mayer
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2023cv00410
Petitioner:
Justin Tyrone Young
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bass v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2023cv00209
Petitioner:
Phillip Wesley Bass
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
