Cases 21 - 30 of 10,907
Stevenson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00340
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Stevenson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Briggs v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00327
Petitioner:
Charles Wade Briggs
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Briggs v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00330
Petitioner:
Charles Wade Briggs
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrison v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 9:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Wendell Harrison
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Property Officer Garret
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fregia v. Warden Marshall, et al.
as 6:2024cv00136
Petitioner:
Kirk Asa Fregia, Sr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Fredrick Fitzgerald Scott, Sr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00406
Petitioner:
Dralon Duran Patterson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevenson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00132
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Stevenson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCoy v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
James McCoy
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Birdo v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Kenneth R Birdo
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
