Cases 31 - 40 of 80
Nichols v. IDOC Director et al
as 3:2016cv01101
Petitioner:
Demetrius M Nichols
Respondent:
IDOC Director, Kimberly Butler
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Archie Brown v. Salvador Godinez, et al
as 16-3527
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARCHIE BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Director of IDOC, KEITH ANGLIN, Warden, Asst. Warden of Programs
Walker v. Lashbrook et al
as 3:2016cv00758
Plaintiff:
Bruce Walker
Defendant:
Jacqueline Lashbrook, Suzann Bailey, Director of IDOC
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
James Lewis v. State of Illinois, et al
as 16-2125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES D. LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, BRUCE V. RAUNER, Governor of the State of Illinois, JOHN BALDWIN, Director of the IDOC
and others
Rivera v. Raines et al
as 3:2016cv00450
Plaintiff:
Adam Rivera
Defendant:
Warden Raines, James Myotoba, Dee Dee Brookhardt
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Lashbrook et al
as 3:2016cv00370
Plaintiff:
James Jackson
Defendant:
J Lashbrook, Director of IDOC, Suzann Bailey
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Waltrip v. Lashbrook et al
as 3:2016cv00355
Plaintiff:
Frank Waltrip
Defendant:
Jacqueline Lashbrook, Director of IDOC, Marcus Hardy
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Shah et al
as 3:2016cv00324
Plaintiff:
David A Adams
Defendant:
Vipen Shah, Wexford Medical Services, Suzann Bailey
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Shah et al
as 3:2016cv00311
Plaintiff:
David A Adams
Defendant:
Vipen Shah, Wexford Medical Sources, Director of IDOC
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Director of IDOC et al
as 4:2016cv04054
Plaintiff:
Stevie Jackson
Defendant:
Director of IDOC, Kevwe Akpore, Stiles
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
