Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Dish Network v. Vigneswaran
as 24-20064
Plaintiff:
Dish Network, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Dinesh Vigneswaran, doing business as Chitram TV Canada and Chitram.ca
Dish Network L.L.C. v. Gaby Fraifer, et al
as 24-10223
Plaintiff:
DISH NETWORK L.L.C.
Defendant:
GABY FRAIFER, TELE-CENTER, INC. and PLANET TELECOM, INC.
DISH Network L.L.C. v. Massive Wireless, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv09071
Plaintiff:
DISH Network L.L.C.
Defendant:
Massive Wireless, Inc., Khaled Akhtar, Rays IPTV LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
DISH Network v. Elahmad
as 23-20180
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dish Network, L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellee:
Bassam Elahmad, also known as Bassem El Ahmad, doing business as Elahmad.com
Dish Network v. Vigneswaran
as 22-20629
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Dish Network, L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellant:
Dinesh Vigneswaran, doing business as Chitram TV Canada and Chitram.ca
DISH Network L.L.C. v. Datacamp Limited
as 1:2022cv00993
Plaintiff:
DISH Network L.L.C.
Defendant:
Datacamp Limited administrator d/b/a CDN77 and Datapacket
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
DISH Network L.L.C. v. 786 Wireless World, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05730
Plaintiff:
DISH Network L.L.C.
Defendant:
786 Wireless World, Inc., 786 Enterprises, Inc., Rana M. Afzal and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Dish Network L.L.C. v. Does 1-10
as 1:2021cv06730
Plaintiff:
Dish Network L.L.C.
Defendant:
Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
DISH Network L.L.C. v. Vigneswaran et al
as 4:2021cv00859
Plaintiff:
DISH Network L.L.C.
Defendant:
Dinesh Vigneswaran agent of d/b/a ChitramTV Canada and Chitram.ca and DOES 1-10, d/b/a ChitramTV and Chitram.tv
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
DISH Network L.L.C. v. DOES 1-3, d/b/a Elahmad.com
as 4:2021cv00581
Defendant:
DOES 1-3, d/b/a Elahmad.com and Does 1-3 doing business as Elahmad.com
Plaintiff:
DISH Network L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
