Cases 1 - 10 of 23
United States of America ex rel. Mary Bixler Wood v. Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.
as 23-7468
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY BIXLER WOOD
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel Mary Bixler Wood, ALASKA, ex rel. Mary Bixler Wood, CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Mary Bixler Wood and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC., SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS, INC. and SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS PRODUCTS GMBH
United States of America v. U.S. Oncology, Inc.
as 23-1334
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Omni Healthcare, State of California, ex rel. Omni Healthcare, State of Colorado, ex rel. Omni Healthcare and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Omni Healthcare Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Oncology, Inc.
United States of America, ex rel. et al v. MBM Solutions L.L.C., et al
as 1:2019cv01833
Defendant:
John Doe, MBM Solutions L.L.C. doing business as Avada Health, Cliff and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel., State of Alaska, ex rel., State of California, ex rel. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks v. Amgen Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv03096
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks, State of California ex rel. Don Hanks, State of Delaware ex rel. Don Hanks and others
Defendant:
Amgen Inc., Florida Cancer Specialist, Gulfcoast Oncology Associates and others
Interested Party:
21st Century Oncology of Jacksonville, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America v. McKesson Corporation
as 23-726
Plaintiff:
ABC, United States of America, ex rel, State of California, ex rel and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Adam Hart
Defendant / Appellee:
McKesson Corporation, McKesson Specialty Distribution LLC, Collectively and McKesson Specialty Care Distrobution Corportaion, Collectively, DBA McKesson Specialty Health
Defendant:
DEF and McKesson Specialty Care Distribution JV LLC, FKA McKesson Specialty Care Distribution Joint Venture LP
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks v. Amgen Inc.
as 23-28
Plaintiff:
State of California ex rel. Don Hanks, State of Delaware ex rel. Don Hanks, District of Columbia ex rel. Don Hanks and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks
Defendant / Appellee:
Florida Cancer Specialists, Gulfcoast Oncology Associates, Integrated Community Oncology Network, LLC and others
Defendant:
Amgen Inc., Montgomery Cancer Center, Oncology Specialties, P.C. and others
Zachary Silbersher, et al v. Allergan, Inc., et al
as 21-15420
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ALLERGAN USA, INC., ALLERGAN SALES, LLC, ADAMAS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Zachary Silbersher, et al v. Allergan, Inc., et al
as 21-80005
Respondent:
STATE OF HAWAII, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF IOWA and others
Petitioner:
ALLERGAN SALES, LLC, ALLERGAN USA, INC., ALLERGAN, INC. and others
United States of America ex rel. et al Nix v. United Biologics, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01486
Defendant:
United Biologics, LLC doing business as United Allergy Services formerly known as United Allergy Labs, United Allergy Labs, Decatur Pediatric Group, P.A. and others
Petitioner:
Bothwell Law Group, P.C., Mike Bothwell and Bothwell Bracker P.C.
Plaintiff:
United States of America ex rel., State of California ex rel., State of Colorado ex rel. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America ex re v. Abbvie Inc.
as 19-2947
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of North Carolina ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D., State of Texas ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D., State of New York ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D. and others
Defendant:
Anthem, Inc., formerly Wellpoint, CVS Caremark, Eli Lilly & Company and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Humana Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, CVS Health Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
ABC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
