Cases 1 - 10 of 40,145
Myers et al v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al
as 1:2024cv07257
Plaintiff:
Joseph Myers, Peter Lorenzi, Chauntique David and others
Defendant:
ACTING ANNA M. KROSS CENTER WARDEN JOHN OR JANE DOE, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION COMMISSIONER LOUIS MOLINA, DOC OFFICERS JOHN OR JANE DOE 1 - 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Backgrid USA, Inc. v. Interview, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv07254
Defendant:
Interview, Inc. and Does 1 through 20
Plaintiff:
Backgrid USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
El Sayad v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv06776
Defendant:
City of New York, John and Jane Doe and Police Officer Damie Danseglio
Plaintiff:
Adam El Sayad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv06763
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv06765
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv06766
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DOE
as 2:2024cv06768
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv06770
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv06771
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv06773
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
