Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gibson v. Idleberg et al
as 6:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
Courtney Gibson
Defendant:
Idleberg, Chief Executive Officer, John Doe # 4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amaya Cruz et al v. Miami-Dade County et al
as 1:2022cv20314
Plaintiff:
Gabriela Amaya Cruz, Christian Pallidine and Angel Jae Torres Bucci
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County, Daniel Junior, Captain J Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. Inch et al
as 2:2021cv00859
Plaintiff:
Barry Sanders
Defendant:
Secretary Mark S. Inch, ICT Board John Doe1, ICT Board John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AUGUSTINE v. INCH et al
as 4:2021cv00123
Defendant:
MARK INCH, DAVIS, BAINE and others
Plaintiff:
JULIO AUGUSTINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NUNEZ v. LEAVINS et al
as 4:2021cv00101
Defendant:
MAXIE, JOHN DOE #20, BISHOP and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN NUNOZ and JONATHAN NUNEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MENDOZA v. INCH et al
as 4:2020cv00214
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 19, JOHN DOE 21, BRIAN LEACH and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE RICHARD MENDOZA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borroto v. Lees et al
as 6:2019cv00851
Defendant:
John Doe 9, Peter Crank, Lees Eid and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Armas Borroto, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory v. United States of America et al
as 5:2018cv00381
Defendant:
John Doe 6, M. Chaney, John/Jane Does 10, 11 and others
Plaintiff:
Larry F. Gregory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. VAN et al
as 4:2015cv00053
Plaintiff:
JAMES V SMITH, JR
Defendant:
ADAM VAN, BAILEY, MISTY L HOWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tomblin v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00309
Plaintiff:
Charles Franklin Tomblin
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Warden Hicks, Corrections Officer Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
