Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Lipscomb v. Carbondale Memorial Hospital et al
as 3:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Carbondale Memorial Hospital, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Does 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01062
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Does 1, John Does 2, John Does 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thornton v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Thornton
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Willis et al
as 3:2023cv02804
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jones
Defendant:
Anthony Willis, Rob Jeffreys, Mr. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharples v. Bebout et al
as 3:2023cv00997
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Sharples
Defendant:
Sgt. Bebout, Lt. Bebout, Lt. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Sawyer et al
as 3:2022cv00632
Plaintiff:
James E. Walker
Defendant:
Sawyer, C/O Dunlap, C/O Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2021cv00779
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, David Pfister, Amy Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McRae v. Myers et al
as 3:2020cv00410
Defendant:
Leslie McCarty, Rob Jeffreys, John Doe 7 and others
Plaintiff:
Charles A McRae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. United States et al
as 3:2019cv00440
Petitioner:
Sacorey Lennel Clark, Sacorey Lennel Clark Trust and Secured Party Sacorey-Lennel
Respondent:
USA, United States Department of Justice, John Doe, 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clark v. United States et al
as 3:2019cv00297
Petitioner:
Sacorey Lennel Clark, Sacorey Lennel Clark Trust, Sacorey Clark and others
Respondent:
John Doe, 3, United States, John Doe, 5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
