Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Siegienczuk v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv02874
Plaintiff:
Angelica Siegienczuk
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Chicago Police Officer John Doe 2, Chicago Police Officer John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banister v. Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv01658
Defendant:
Daniel Szalko, City of Chicago, Zachary Negrete and others
Plaintiff:
Jaden Banister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Willis v. O'Shea et al
as 3:2020cv50291
Defendant:
Brandon Mather, Dan O'Shea, Andrew Kennington and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas et al v. P.O. John Doe #1 et al
as 1:2020cv04323
Plaintiff:
Estate of Steven Tyrel Rosenthal, Jr. and Terinica Thomas
Defendant:
P.O. John Doe #2, P.O. John Doe #3, P.O. John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohammed v. The State of Illinois et al
as 3:2020cv50133
Defendant:
Andrea Szczepanski, Paul Leong, Saima Azfar and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donaldson v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv05869
Defendant:
Jhon Doe 2, Mack Smith, City of Chicago and others
Plaintiff:
Pedro Donaldson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dix v. Edelman Financial Services, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv06561
Defendant:
Theresa Miller, Edelman Financial Services, LLC, Jane Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Dix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farrow Jr v. Champaign County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv02086
Plaintiff:
Paul Raymond Farrow Jr
Defendant:
Champaign County Sheriff's Office, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
