Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Flores v. Target Corporation, et al.
as 1:2022cv00424
Plaintiff:
Sulema Flores
Defendant:
Target Corporation and Does 1-4
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Zink, et al. v. St. Luke's Health System, LTD, et al.
as 1:2022cv00359
Plaintiff:
Adam F. Zink and Lauren Zink
Defendant:
St. Luke's Health System, LTD, Selecthealth, Inc. and John Does 1-4
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Floyd v. Ada County et al
as 1:2020cv00347
Defendant:
Ada County, Amanda, Samuel Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
James A Floyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kesling v. Becirovic et al
as 1:2019cv00352
Defendant:
Melisa Becirovic, State of Idaho, Jay Christensen and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn M Kesling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bourquin v. Corizon Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00328
Defendant:
Corp Civic, Brent D. Reinke, John Does 1-4 and others
Plaintiff:
Edwin Bourquin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moreno v. Blackhawk et al
as 4:2015cv00342
Plaintiff:
Ashlyn Moreno
Defendant:
Ryan Blackhawk, Paul C Olsen and John Doe 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Briggs v. Faulhaber et al
as 1:2014cv00146
Plaintiff:
Erick Briggs
Defendant:
Tami Faulhaber, Sheriff Canyon County Idaho and John Does 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flieger v. City of Twin Falls et al
as 1:2010cv00152
Plaintiff:
Phillip Duane Flieger
Defendant:
City of Twin Falls, Twin Falls County Jail, Twin Falls County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Valdez et al
as 1:2009cv00452
Plaintiff:
Bob Jones
Defendant:
Phillip Valdez, Daniel Prado, Shane Jepsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loftis v. Valdez et al
as 1:2009cv00454
Plaintiff:
Kirk Loftis
Defendant:
Phillip Valdez, Daniel Prado, Shane Jepsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
