Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Marne Mitskog v. DOJ, et al
as 23-5121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marne K. Mitskog
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, Jennie L. Kneedler, Stephen J. Buckingham and others
MCKINNEY v. DOE OFFICERS 1-4
as 1:2022cv02943
Plaintiff:
JONATHON B. MCKINNEY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE OFFICERS 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2022cv02763
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and JOHN DOE OFFICERS 1-4
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2022cv02762
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and JOHN DOE OFFICERS 1-4
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0555 b Agency Decision - Right to Counsel
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2022cv02302
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and JOHN DOE OFFICERS 1-4
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2022cv02301
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and JOHN DOE OFFICERS 1-4
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
CARMER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv01100
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH CARMER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MARK ADAMCHIK, JOHN DOE OFFICER 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
GOODWIN et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2021cv00806
Defendant:
JOHN DOE OFFICERS 1-50, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and PETER NEWSHAM
Plaintiff:
ALLISON LANE, SEBASTIAN MEDINA-TAYAC, JENNY LAZO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COPELAND et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2016cv00036
Plaintiff:
LAVELLE EVERT COPELAND and DARION EUGENE MILLER
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , MURIEL BOWSER , KENNETH HARDING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
