Cases 1 - 10 of 5,908
Catlin Insurance Company v. Champ Construction Company et al
as 1:2024cv04499
Plaintiff:
Catlin Insurance Company
Defendant:
Champ Construction Company, American Empire Insurance Company, Merchants Mutual Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 jd Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Zebra Strategies Inc. v. Gonzalez- Nazario et al
as 1:2024cv04146
Plaintiff:
Zebra Strategies Inc.
Defendant:
Ada Gonzalez- Nazario, Sean Goodman, SAGO INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
Melvin v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv04118
Plaintiff:
Rodney Melvin
Defendant:
City of New York, Cheryl Leon, Kazimir Vilenchik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rubie's II, LLC v. Ma et al
as 1:2024cv04079
Plaintiff:
Rubie's II, LLC
Defendant:
Xiao Ma doing business as Funflatable doing business as Zpisf, John or Jane Does 1-10 and John Doe Companies 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Chan et al v. Sienna Marketing and Consulting, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04071
Plaintiff:
Shihwen Simon Chan and Sysonic Electronics, Inc.
Defendant:
Sienna Marketing and Consulting, Inc. doing business as Creative Capital Solutions, City Capital NY, LLC, ProVenture Capital, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Santiago v. City of Rome et al
as 6:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Larry Santiago
Defendant:
City of Rome, City of Rome Police Department, Officer Joseph Longo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Torres v. Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks Coffee Company et al
as 1:2024cv03945
Plaintiff:
Kelvys Salas Torres
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks Coffee Company, Jane Does 1-10 and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
DAVID A. BIRDSELL v. THE EUCLID CHEMICAL COMPANY et al
as 1:2024cv03817
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. BIRDSELL
Defendant:
The Euclid Chemical Company, RPM International Inc., Compagnie De Saint-Gobain S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
