Cases 1 - 10 of 17
DOES 1-7 v. TALIBAN et al
as 1:2021mc00110
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOES 1-7
Defendant:
TALIBAN, AL-QAEDA and HAQQANI NETWORK
ASINOR et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2021cv02158
Plaintiff:
Oyoma Asinor and Bryan Dozier
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, JOHN DOES 1-7, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIRLEAF v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2019cv02520
Defendant:
BARBARA MIKELJOHN, LYNDA BURROWS, JORDAN and others
Plaintiff:
MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIRLEAF v. CLARKE et al
as 1:2019cv02521
Defendant:
HAROLD CLARKE, LYNDA BURROWS, D.Y. KINSLEY and others
Plaintiff:
MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIRLEAF v. NORTHAM et al
as 1:2019cv02525
Defendant:
LYNDA BURROWS, DOES #1-7, MARK HERRING and others
Plaintiff:
MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIRLEAF v. AMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv02522
Defendant:
AMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., HAROLD CLARKE, LYNDA BURROWS and others
Plaintiff:
MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIRLEAF v. ARMOR HEALTH SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv02524
Defendant:
ARMOR HEALTH SERVICES, INC., SHAW, LYNDA BURROWS and others
Plaintiff:
MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIRLEAF v. SCHIFF et al
as 1:2019cv02523
Defendant:
ROD ROSENSTEIN, LYNDA BURROWS, ANDREW MCCABE and others
Plaintiff:
MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALLACE v. US SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ETHICS et al
as 1:2014cv01931
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN P. WALLACE
Defendant:
US SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ETHICS and JOHN DOES 1-7
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
WALLACE v. US SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ETHICS et al
as 1:2014cv01878
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN P. WALLACE
Defendant:
US SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ETHICS and JOHN DOES 1-7
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
