Cases 11 - 20 of 33
M S International, Inc. v. Target Stone, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv01054
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive and Target Stone, LLC
Plaintiff:
M S International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Keck v. Mix Creative Learning Center, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00430
Defendant:
JACQUELINE P. KENNEALLY, MIX CREATIVE LEARNING CENTER, LLC and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive
Plaintiff:
MICHEL KECK
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Sadowski v. Forward Times Publishing Co. et al
as 6:2020cv00073
Defendant:
Forward Times Publishing Co. and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sadowski
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Wareka v. Johnson
as 1:2020cv01183
Plaintiff:
TAMARA WAREKA aka TAMARA WILLIAMS, Tamara Wareka and Tamara Williams
Defendant:
Does 1 Through 10 Inclusive, RACHEL SPILLMAN JOHNSON d/b/a SKIN BY RACHEL and Rachel Spillman Johnson doing business as Skin by Rachel
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Hirsch v. Owen et al
as 1:2019cv01037
Defendant:
DOUGLAS WILLIAM OWEN, OWEN MEDIA GROUP LLC, Does 1 Through 10 Inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN HIRSCH
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Noriega v. BackChina, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv03549
Plaintiff:
Alex Noriega
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10 inclusive and BackChina, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Bowers v. BackChina, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv03544
Defendant:
BackChina, LLC. and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive
Plaintiff:
Eric Bowers
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Farrington v. BackChina, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv03546
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10 inclusive and BackChina, LLC
Plaintiff:
William Farrington
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Gottfried v. BackChina, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv03548
Plaintiff:
Seth Gottfried
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10 inclusive and BackChina, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Sadowski v. BackChina, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv03550
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sadowski
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10 inclusive and BackChina, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
