Cases 51 - 60 of 431
HINES v. C R BARD INC et al
as 2:2020cv01280
Plaintiff:
TONI HINES
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, C R BARD INC, DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Head v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv00176
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, C R BARD INC, DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE and others
Plaintiff:
GALEN HEAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matter v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 1:2020cv01593
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Debra Matter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Long v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2020cv04302
Plaintiff:
Diana Long
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, C R BARD INC, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oxenreider v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 1:2020cv01595
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 inclusive, McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Cindy Oxenreider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pitts v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2020cv12304
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, C R Bard Inc, BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PITTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zuzek v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv01591
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 inclusive, McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Zuzek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curry v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2020cv04263
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CURRY
Defendant:
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INC., MCKESSON CORPORATION, C R BARD INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ganoe v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 1:2020cv01590
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 inclusive, C R Bard Inc, McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Ganoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arkadyey et al v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2020cv04280
Defendant:
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INC., MCKESSON CORPORATION, C R BARD INC and others
Plaintiff:
Yuri Arkadyev
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
