Cases 31 - 40 of 42
TORUSIO v. MONROE et al
as 2:2011cv00452
Plaintiff:
DESIREE TORUSIO
Defendant:
JANET MONROE , MICHAEL S. STEWART , DENISE PAULSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv05437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
COLE v. TOWN OF MORRISTOWN et al
as 2:2010cv04706
Plaintiff:
FRANCINE COLE
Defendant:
TOWN OF MORRISTOWN, DONALD CRESITELLO, TIM DOUGHERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MARQUEZ et al v. DREW et al
as 3:2010cv03113
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL MARQUEZ and ANGELA MARQUEZ
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER DREW , EDWARD EMDE, THE TRENTON POLICE DIVISION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00978
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
BARATTA v. COUNTY OF OCEAN et al
as 3:2010cv00362
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BARATTA
Defendant:
COUNTY OF OCEAN, OCEAN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, MARLENE LYNCH FORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRADIN v. COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND et al
as 1:2009cv02896
Plaintiff:
ERIC BRADIN
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND, CUMBERLAND COUINTY GUIDANCE CENTER and JOHN DOES #1-15
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SERODIO v. UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2009cv02221
Plaintiff:
PAULO SERODIO
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY, ROBERT L. JOHNSON, MD, I. THOMAS COHEN, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv06030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
