Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
E. W. et al v. State of California et al
as 8:2021cv00398
Defendant:
Doe CHP Officers, State of California, California Highway Patrol and others
Plaintiff:
E. W. and L. W.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
I.M. et al v. State of California et al
as 2:2020cv11174
Plaintiff:
Brianna Palomino, Edward Tapia, Cheryl Tapia-Rufener and others
Defendant:
State Of California, California Highway Patrol, Doe CHP Officers and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
E.W. and L.W.
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Officer Diego Romero, Officer Justin Silva, Officer Dusty Osmanson and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
R.N. Arbi Baghalian and Vital Medical Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Christopher Barrett Smith v. City of Santa Barbara et al
as 2:2019cv04366
Defendant:
City of Santa Barbara, Officer Thomas Van Eyck, Santa Barbara Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Barrett Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cuba Woods v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitaton et al
as 2:2019cv04061
Plaintiff:
Cuba Woods
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitaton, Doe Parole Officers and Does 11-20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albert Sardarbekians v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2019cv00864
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services, Ms. Anna Safarian, Ms. Bridgette Amador and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Sardarbekians
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Christopher Ziemer v. County of Santa Barbara et al
as 2:2018cv10054
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA, DOES 1 through 10, California Forensic Medical Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
David Christopher ZIEMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
