Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Dominguez et al v. Kami Ramen Group Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02189
Plaintiff:
Nallely Dominguez and Marcelino Perez
Defendant:
Kami Ramen Group Inc. and Kami Ramen Bar Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
De La Torre Cueto et al v. Tolentino et al
as 2:2022cv02079
Plaintiff:
Karla C De La Torre Cueto, Paola W De La Torre Cueto, Eufemia Garcia Diaz and others
Defendant:
Maria Tolentino, Edgar Martinez and ARAS Business Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Islas et al v. Saddler Funeral Home and Crematory Services et al
as 3:2021cv00877
Plaintiff:
Maria Genoveva Islas, Alejandro Dominguez Islas and Filiberto Dominguez Lechuga
Defendant:
Saddler Funeral Home and Crematory Services, Stevie Saddler and Reid Van Ness
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Torres v. Saddler Funeral Home and Crematory Services et al
as 3:2021cv00583
Plaintiff:
Martha Angelica Dominguez Torres
Defendant:
Saddler Funeral Home and Crematory Services, Stevie Saddler and Reid Van Ness
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Acklin et al v. Express Courier International, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00028
Plaintiff:
Paige Acklin , Steve Acuff , Michael L. Adkison and others
Defendant:
Express Courier International, Inc. and EMP LSO Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Britton v. United States of America et al
as 3:2007cv00591
Plaintiff:
Coozie Britton, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Cari M. Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Piedra, et al v. Dallas & Mavis Spec, et al
as 3:2004cv00615
Plaintiff:
Carmelo Arriaga Piedra , Cecilia Dominguez Hernandez and Miriam Yuly Luevano Sanchez
Defendant:
Dallas & Mavis Specialized Carrier Co. LLC , Karen Beeson and Timothy Price
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Maria Sebastiana Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
