Cases 1 - 10 of 128
(PC) Martinez, Jr. v. Pogue et al
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Joe Martinez, Jr.
Defendant:
Tyson Pogue, Jason Quick, Alva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oscar Horacio Dominguez Urueta v. Warden FCC Lompoc Low II
as 2:2023cv10607
Petitioner:
Oscar Horacio Dominguez Urueta
Respondent:
Warden FCC Lompoc Low II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dominguez v. S.F. FBI
as 5:2023cv05118
Petitioner:
Jose Miguel Dominguez
Respondent:
S.F. FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ray Medina v. R.C. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv04135
Plaintiff:
Ray Medina
Defendant:
R. C. Johnson, Z. Neblet, Maria Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Medina v. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv00873
Plaintiff:
Ray Medina
Defendant:
RC Johnson, Z. Neblet, Maria Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Palacios et al
as 4:2023cv00640
Plaintiff:
JayVion Ross
Defendant:
N. Palacios, C. Tanari, J. Juarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Grandos-Dominguez v. Warden, FCI Mendota
as 1:2022cv01495
Petitioner:
Ramiro Esteban Grandos-Dominguez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Mendota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ray Medina v. R.C. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv04810
Plaintiff:
Ray Medina
Defendant:
R.C. Johnson, Z. Neblet, Maria Dominguez and others
Respondent:
J. Phelan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Medina v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01163
Plaintiff:
Ray Medina
Defendant:
R.C. Johnson, Z. Neblet, Maria Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackgold v. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv00915
Plaintiff:
Suten Blackgold
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, Mario Alonzo, D. Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
