Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Lewis v. Bartosh
as 22-3060
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Oswald A. Lewis
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher Bartosh, Deputy U.S. Marshal Brian Banks, Deputy Ryan Thomas Westfield and others
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, (ATF), United States Marshals Service, (USMS), Howard Stern, Bureau of Alcohol Firearm and Explosives (ATF) and others
Chiaravallo v. Middletown Transit District
as 21-2638
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Andrew Chiaravallo
Defendant:
Middletown Transit District, William Donahue, Beverly Lawrence and others
Defendant / Appellant:
City of Middletown and Daniel Drew
Lewis v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Fi
as 21-1800
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Oswald A. Lewis
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Marshals Service, Howard Stern, Bureau of Alcohol Firearm and Explosives (ATF) and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher Bartosh, United States Marshal Service (USMS), Brian Banks, Deputy U.S. Marshal, Deputy Ryan Thomas Westfield and others
Lewis v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Fi
as 21-1417
Defendant:
Howard Stern, Bureau of Alcohol Firearm and Explosives (ATF), Ayesha Winston, Bureau of Alcohol Firearm and Explosives (ATF), Sandy Rao, United States Marshal Service (USMS) and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Oswald Lewis and Oswald A. Lewis
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher Bartos, United States Marshal Service (USMS), Deputy Antony Dineen, Brian Banks, Deputy U.S. Marshal and others
McNeil v. Yale University
as 21-639
Defendant:
Wallace H. Campbell & Company, Inc., 340 Elm, LLC, Sig Ep Housing of Connecticut Delta, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Sigma Nu Fraternity Beta Alpha Chapter, Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity, House Corporation of Sigma Chi at Yale I and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eliana Singer, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Ry Walker, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Engender, on behalf of itself and its members and others
In Re: Reginald McFadden
as 21-2
Respondent:
Thomas Bellein, C-COC-NYS, Carl J. Koenigsmann, Deputy Commissioner; Chief Medical Officer of DOCCS, William Canfield, Medical Director; Southport Correctional Facility and others
Petitioner:
Reginald McFadden, AKA Reginald Ghaffar McFadden
McFadden v. Annucci
as 19-585
Defendant:
Carl J. Koenigsmann, Deputy Commissioner; Chief Medical Officer of DOCCS, J. Cross, Mailroom Supervisor; ACF, Thomas Bellein, C-COC-NYS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
R. Roemesser, Inmate Assistant, Attica Correctional Facility, Joseph Noeth, First Deputy Superintendent at ACF and Eric Schuessler, Corrections Officer; ACF
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reginald McFadden, AKA Reginald Ghaffar McFadden
Abreu v. Wells
as 19-566
Defendant / Appellee:
Ms. Stevens, RMHU Medical Nurse, Marcy Correctional Facility, Mr. Maher, Chief of OSI, NYS DOCCS, Mr. Sanatoro, Social Worker and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Abreu v. Hilton
as 19-578
Defendant / Appellee:
Mr. Mayo, Correction Officer; Marcy Correctional Facility, Mr. J. O'Gorman, Deputy Commissioner Correctional Facility, Ms. Spine, Counselor/ORC; Marcy Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Ms. M. Morrison, Director of Risk Management OMH/CNYPC, R. Montes, Coordinator of Cultural and Language Access Services, Mr. Bell, Supervisor Counselor (SORC); Marcy Correctional Facility and others
Abreu v. Dougherty
as 19-586
Defendant / Appellee:
Mr. Garza, OMH Clinician Social Worker at Marcy Correctional Facility/RMHU, Mr. Sanatoro, OMH Clinician Social Worker at Marcy Correctional Facility/RMHU, L. Collins, Deputy Superintendent for Security, Marcy Correctional Facility and others
Defendant:
Mr. Venettozzi, William Dawson, Director of Correctional Dental Services, DOCCS, Miller, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
