Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Libertarian Party of Illinois, et al v. William Cadigan, et al
as 20-1961
Defendant / Appellant:
CASSANDRA B. WATSON, individual member of the Illinois State Board of Elections, IAN LINNABARY, individual member of the Illinois State Board of Elections, KATHERINE O'BRIEN, individual member of the Illinois State Board of Elections and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF ILLINOIS, SHELDON SCHAFER, KYLE K. KOPITKE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States of America v. Donahue
as 2:2014mc00028
Respondent:
Thomas Donahue
Petitioner:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Donahue v. Credit Control, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00137
Plaintiff:
Lee Donahue
Defendant:
Credit Control, LLC and United Debt Holding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv07992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Robert Donahue v. CIR
as 12-3149
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT DONAHUE
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Carrie Donahue v. CIR
as 12-3148
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARRIE DONAHUE
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2012mc00053
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
PHILIP LYNN CARSON, EDWIN HENRY FISHER, JR., TODD EDWIN HAINES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
