Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02765
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Smith v. Hamilton County Sheriff et al
as 1:2017cv00010
Plaintiff: James D Smith
Defendant: Hamilton County Sheriff, Greer, Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn v. Donahue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv02598
Petitioner: Twain D. Vaughn
Respondent: Michael Donahue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Powell v. Woodard et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01007
Plaintiff: Joseph Powell
Defendant: Jason Woodard, Donahue, Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gooch v. Correction Corporation of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv02744
Plaintiff: James Gooch
Defendant: Correction Corporation of America, Michael Donahue, Robert Shouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gooch v. Correction Corporation of America et al
as 2:2015cv02744
Plaintiff: James Gooch
Defendant: Correction Corporation of America, Michael Donahue, Robert Shouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Donahue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01207
Petitioner: Dana Keith Woods
Respondent: Michael Donahue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Griffin v. Donahue
as 2:2015cv02372
Petitioner: Cortez Griffin
Respondent: Michael Donahue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moffitt v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2015cv01115
Plaintiff: Johnny Moffitt
Defendant: Corrections Corporation of America, Michael Donahue, Mitchell Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Short v. Donahue
as 3:2015cv00500
Petitioner: Nicholas Short
Respondent: Michael Donahue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?