Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Donahue v. Wills
as 1:2021cv03562
Respondent:
Anthony Wil and Anthony Wills
Petitioner:
Dwond Donahue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FRITZ v. DONAHUE
as 2:2008cv00323
Respondent:
J. DAVID DONAHUE
Petitioner:
DENNIS FRITZ
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WESTLAKE v. DONAHUE
as 2:2008cv00164
Petitioner:
MARK A. WESTLAKE
Respondent:
J. DAVID DONAHUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RAMSEY v. DONAHUE et al
as 1:2008cv00423
Petitioner:
WILLIAM L. RAMSEY
Respondent:
J. DAVID DONAHUE, WENDY KNIGHT, CHRISTOPHER E. MELOY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROLLINGCLOUD v. HANLON et al
as 1:2007cv01411
Petitioner:
KENNETH ROLLINGCLOUD
Respondent:
TOM HANLON, IDOC PAROLE DIVISION, J. DAVID DONAHUE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 3:2007cv00741
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Warden Hudson, Michael B. Mukasey, Peter Keisler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KELLER v. DONAHUE
as 1:2007cv01250
Petitioner:
JOHN WAYNE KELLER, JR.
Respondent:
J. DAVID DONAHUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROYAL v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2007cv01224
Petitioner:
VALGENE ROYAL
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, DAVID J. DONAHUE and CHRISTOPHER MELOY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROYAL v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2007cv01208
Petitioner:
VALGENE ROYAL
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT, DAVID J. DONAHUE and CHRISTOPHER MELOY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COOPER v. DONAHUE
as 3:2007cv00072
Plaintiff:
LOWELL COOPER
Defendant:
J. DAVID DONAHUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
