Cases 1 - 10 of 15
MCCOY v. SCOTT et al
as 1:2023cv21272
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MCCOY
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, TPR. J. D. ANGELO, TPR. M. WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DONAHUE v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2017cv02750
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M. DONAHUE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DAVID OWENS and KATE TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DONAHUE v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06413
Plaintiff:
JEREMY T. DONAHUE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHERRY v. COLE et al
as 1:2013cv02144
Petitioner:
BENJAMIN J. WHERRY, SR.
Respondent:
COLE, FCI FORT DIX, DONAHUE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CIRAOLO v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2012cv07159
Petitioner:
EUGENE CIRAOLO
Respondent:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., J.L. NORWOOD, JORDAN HOLLINGSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FARUQ v. MCCOLLUM et al
as 1:2011cv05987
Plaintiff:
KARIM FARUQ
Defendant:
MARY MCCOLLUM, D. SCHAAF and ROBERT DONAHUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KITCHEN v. GRONDOLSKY et al
as 1:2011cv05834
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL KITCHEN
Defendant:
JEFF GRONDOLSKY, DONNA ZICKEFOOSE, ROBERT DONAHUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv04951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
TROWELL v. SOUTH et al
as 2:2010cv02599
Plaintiff:
SALAHDIN TROWELL
Defendant:
JAMES DEAN SOUTH, I. MARCO RODRIGUEZ, F.J. LARAWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GATSON et al v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2010cv01473
Plaintiff:
DANIEL GATSON and JERRY MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COUNTY OF BERGEN, NJ, OFFICE OF THE BERGEN COUNTY PROSECUTORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
