Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Dontae Satchel v. Warden, et al
as 12-16135
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONTAE LEVAR SATCHEL
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Satchel v. Patterson et al
as 1:2012cv00374
Plaintiff:
Dontae Levar Satchel
Defendant:
Patterson and Givens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Satchel v. Patterson et al
as 5:2012cv01702
Petitioner:
Dontae Levar Satchel
Respondent:
Patterson and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Satchel v. Patterson et al
as 7:2012cv01700
Plaintiff:
Dontae Levar Satchel
Defendant:
Patterson and Givens
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Satchel v. Bibb County Correctional Facility et al
as 7:2011cv00982
Plaintiff:
Dontae Levar Satchel
Defendant:
Bibb County Correctional Facility, Myre and Dixon
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Satchel v. Parker et al
as 7:2011cv00466
Plaintiff:
Dontae Levar Satchel
Defendant:
James Parker and S. Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Satchel v. Bibb County Correctional Facility
as 7:2010cv03519
Plaintiff:
Dontae Levar Satchel
Defendant:
Bibb County Correctional Facility
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Satchel v. Alabama, State of et al
as 5:2010cv02155
Petitioner:
Dontae Levar Satchel
Respondent:
Alabama, State of and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Satchel v. Lawrence County Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2010cv01800
Plaintiff:
Dontae Levar Satchel
Defendant:
Lawrence County Sheriffs Department, James Baker and Gene Mitchell
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Satchel v. Henry F Sherrod III PC et al
as 5:2010cv01326
Plaintiff:
Dontae Levar Satchel
Defendant:
Henry F Sherrod III PC and Gregory A Reeves
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
