Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Gamble v. Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04683
Plaintiff:
Lucious Gamble
Defendant:
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc., Doubletree by Hilton, Apolinar Robinson and others
Daniels v. Double Tree by Hilton Times Square West
as 1:2023cv04162
Plaintiff:
Tyree Daniels
Defendant:
Double Tree by Hilton Times Square West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Flowers et al v. The State of Texas et al
as 1:2022cv08648
Plaintiff:
Millania Flowers, Zyyon Sims and Trenesha Biggers
Defendant:
The State of Texas, New York ACS, El Paso Child Protective Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. Doubletree by Hilton Syracuse, et al.
as 5:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Double Tree by Hilton Syracuse, Marissa Prasad, Nagib Lakhani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Rodeway Inn Syracuse et al
as 5:2022cv00396
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Rodeway Inn Syracse, Choice Hotels International Inc., Commissioner Teresa Gaffney and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Americas Best Value Inn, Extended Stay America Inc., ESA Management LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lopez v. Deli Cross Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00324
Plaintiff:
Virgilio Lopez
Defendant:
Deli Cross Enterprises, Inc. , Double Tree Cafe Inc. , Yeon-Wan Chun and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Louis v. Simpson et al
as 5:2007cv01318
Plaintiff:
Mathurine M. Louis
Defendant:
David C. Simpson, R.S. Slack Trucking, 1211923 Ontario Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Maxi v. R.S. Slack Trucking et al
as 5:2007cv01319
Plaintiff:
Mildred Maxi
Defendant:
R.S. Slack Trucking, David C. Simpson, 121923 Ontario Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
